Acquisition Cost

  

No, it's not the $600 you paid for those red-bottom Louboutins. Instead, acquisition cost refers to the book value a company recognizes for property, plant, and equipment it has purchased, subtracting other benefits it got when making the purchase, like state tax waivers, "cheap money loans," and free coffee.

So that's acquisition cost as it applies to one business buying stuff meaningful enough to be tracked on the balance sheet. Acquisition cost can also refer to the cost of acquiring a customer. At Shmoop, we don't spend money on marketing, so we have zero costs, other than our own blood, sweat, and tears...mainly tears, in acquiring a customer. But match.com spends a fortune advertising everywhere, and they can do fancypants math, such that in a given year, if they spend $80 million dollars on marketing and get a million new customers, than each new customer costs them, give or take, $80.

The question then revolves around whether that acquisition cost was well spent, i.e., did the customer hang around paying $25 a month or more for at least four months, or did they only sign up for one month and then go away? And/or did they sign up for one month, go away, and then come back six months later after the divorce for a year?

Like the onerous task of finding the proper spouse, identifying whether or not acquisition costs were well spent or not is a moving target.

Related or Semi-related Video

Finance: What is pooling: investment/int...3 Views

00:00

Finance allah shmoop what is pooling Well it's aggregating no

00:08

no aggregating yeah Throwing in cash together partnering pooling interests

00:14

in an investment simply refers to two or more players

00:17

getting together to invest their money in whatever form mutual

00:21

funds are are pooled investment So our index funds hedge

00:24

fund bond funds etfs reads mlps any uh pretty much

00:28

and well every other investment vehicle that can scale to

00:31

allow for two or twenty or two million investors to

00:34

all come together and invest well Why would people want

00:38

to do this scale or rather synergies of costs from

00:41

scale Whether you have one investor or ten thousand you

00:45

need to file papers and there are usually pretty much

00:48

always lawyers involved and accountants and other wall street gum

00:52

sucking gadflies and the marginal additional cost of servicing ten

00:56

thousand pooled investors is only somewhat more than servicing won

01:00

So in many cases pooling makes a lot of sense

01:03

when investors interests are generally aligned and when they're not 00:01:07.229 --> [endTime] around there's trouble

Up Next

Finance: What is The Difference Between a Horizontal and a Vertical Merger?
6 Views

What is the difference between a Horizontal and a Vertical Merger? Horizontal mergers happen when two companies within the same industry decide to...

Finance: What are accretive v dilutive v neutral acquisitions?
18 Views

Accretive: the acquisition has a net positive impact on earnings per share. Dilutive: earnings per share are negatively impacted as a result of the...

Finance: What's the difference between mergers and acquisitions?
23 Views

In a merger, the boards and shareholders of both companies must both vote in favor of the action, and the post merger acquiring company will often...

Find other enlightening terms in Shmoop Finance Genius Bar(f)