Anti-Indemnity Statute

  

Categories: Regulations, Tax

Let's break it down. "Indemnity" means not having a legal responsibility for something. "Anti" is the opposite of something. A "statute" is a law. So the anti-indemnity statute prevents the elimination of legal responsibility for particular parties (it feels like there's a double-negative involved there).

Generally, the anti-indemnity statute is used in the construction business. A contractor hires a subcontractor and attempts to get the subcontractor to take on any risk associated with the project, legal responsibility for things like accidents and safety. The contractor wants indemnity against being sued if something goes wrong.

Anti-indemnity statutes prevent this from happening, at least to some extent. Basically, they put a limit on this indemnity and say that some legal responsibility still rests with the original contractor, whatever it says in the contract they signed with someone else.

The scope of these laws vary from state to state. For instance, DC (which we know isn't technically a state, but still) doesn't have any anti-indemnity statutes on the books (as of 2016). Meanwhile, California is one of the few states that prohibits both broad and intermediate indemnity. This according to a report put out by Matthiesen, Wickert & Lehrer.

Related or Semi-related Video

Finance: What is the Securities Act of 1...60 Views

00:00

Finance a la Shmoop! What is the Securities Act of 1933? Hey, is it these

00:08

axes? No, it's a different act, or a whole bunch of Acts in the 30s and the

00:12

40s. All right, well for a long time the

00:14

little guy had, well not really much more than a prayer, when it came to investing [man praying in church]

00:19

his money. Like investing it well. The stock market appeared to be this wild,

00:23

wild, Westy thing, with few rules and a whole lot of insider trading information,

00:28

driving the bus, or carriage, or whatever they had back then. In fact before 1933,

00:34

securities laws were a, state thing. Each state had its own view as to how much

00:40

the poor uneducated farmer should be protected by the government. In fact

00:45

most really weren't protected at all. Making matters even worse, States [man and woman trading on map]

00:50

citizens, invested in each other all the time. Like across the state border. So

00:56

what would then happen when one set of state's laws, applied to one side of the

01:00

trade and one state set of laws, was conjoined to another set of laws, applied

01:05

to the other in a different state. Yeah that was a problem. Clearly we needed,

01:10

national laws and that's when the 1933 Securities Act was born, setting federal

01:16

law above state law. But keeping state laws generally intact when the [Uncle Sam]

01:21

intrastate activities were happening. What did all that mean? Well it

01:24

meant that the default laws generally revolved around whatever the state had

01:29

already in place. Except in the case where transactions, required a federal

01:34

purview, or look-see. Because the transactions happened among, two or more

01:39

states, or that they violated some major federal law. Like discrimination or

01:44

something like that down the line. Well the notion here, was that, farmers were

01:49

being sold acres of, quote, Blue Sky, unquote. Like you had to pay for the blue [two men in field]

01:54

sky and we're not talking about smog here. Instead of things of real value.

01:58

Right, like farmers would believe that they could buy an acre of blue sky.

02:02

Sorry, farmer Joe, we're just keeping it real there, you really did try to buy

02:06

acres of blue sky. Was solely because, farmer Joe, did not possess the education, [squirrels in head]

02:11

to determine the difference between a real investment opportunity and a fake

02:16

one. Finally the government, well they just had to step in and protect the

02:20

average Joe, from the average, you know Schmo.[man talking in front of parchment]

Up Next

Finance: What is Contingent Liability?
4 Views

What is Contingent Liability? Contingent liability refers to a possible liability in the future contingent upon some other event being the trigger....

Finance: What is the Free Rider Problem?
10 Views

What is the Free Rider Problem? The free rider problem occurs when people take more than their contributed fair share of a common resource. In the...

Finance: What is a Safe Harbor?
3 Views

"Safe harbor" refers to the notion that, if you follow a basic set of rules, you cannot be found guilty of a crime or shady dealings.

Find other enlightening terms in Shmoop Finance Genius Bar(f)