King John Loyalty Quotes

How we cite our quotes: (Act.Scene.Line)

Quote #7

KING JOHN
Yet I love thee well,
And by my troth I think thou lov'st me well.
HUBERT
So well that what you bid me undertake,
Though that my death were adjunct to my act,
By heaven, I would do it. (3.3.56-60)

Compare Hubert's lines to those of the Bastard in the second quotation from this section. In Hubert's words, we find none of the humor that characterized the Bastard's speech; this guy seems to really mean his frightening pledge of ultimate loyalty. Does this mean that Hubert will turn out to be more loyal than the Bastard? Not necessarily, as later events in the play reveal.

Quote #8

ARTHUR
Will you put out mine eyes—
These eyes that never did nor never shall
So much as frown on you?
HUBERT
I have sworn to do it.
And with hot irons must I burn them out. (4.1.62-66)

In these lines, we see the horrible things that loyalty can make people do. Arthur points out that his eyes (and, we can assume, he himself) never did anything to Hubert. But, just because Hubert told King John that he would do it, Hubert says that he is going to go ahead and commit this horrible act. Of course, Hubert doesn't actually go through with it, but he comes pretty darn close. We can pretty safely bet that he's carried out lots of other horrendous murders on the king's behalf (Peter of Pomfret, anyone?). So, yeah, loyalty… sometimes not so good.

Quote #9

KING JOHN
Why seek'st thou to possess me with these fears?
Why urgest thou so oft young Arthur's death?
Thy hand hath murdered him. I had a mighty cause
To wish him dead, but thou hadst none to kill him.
HUBERT
No had, my lord! Why, did you not provoke me?
KING JOHN
It is the curse of kings to be attended
By slaves that take their humors for a warrant
To break within the bloody house of life,
And on the winking of authority
To understand a law, to know the meaning
Of dangerous majesty, when perchance it frowns
More upon humor than advised respect. (4.2.214-225)

These lines make King John look pretty low. We'd say they definitely speak to his weakness of character and his inability to take responsibility for his own actions. That said, he does have a bit of a point. If kings weren't served by people so eager to prove themselves loyal—or if they were served by people who had a better understanding of what kings really need done, not just what they think they need done—it might end up sparing everyone a lot of grief. But, then again, you could say it's the king's fault in the first place for placing such a premium on loyalty that people will commit outrageous crimes just to avoid ending up in the king's bad books—and having such crimes committed against them.