ShmoopTube

Where Monty Python meets your 10th grade teacher.

Search Thousands of Shmoop Videos


Playlist PSAT® Writing 32 videos

0
Wall Street's Recklessness
291 Views

PSAT 1.10 Writing Narrative Walkthrough. How would you change the underlined portion, if at all?

1
Writing Narrative Walkthrough
220 Views

PSAT 1.11 Writing Narrative Walkthrough. How would you change the underlined portion, if at all?

2
Semicolon, Colon, Dashes or No Change?
174 Views

PSAT 1.12 Writing Narrative Walkthrough. How would you change the underlined portion, if at all?

See All

PSAT 1.7 Writing Diagnostic 222 Views


Share It!


Description:

PSAT 1.7 Writing Diagnostic. How would you change the underlined portion of the passage, if at all?


Transcript

00:00

Hurry and here's your shmoop du jour brought to you

00:04

by the circumference of the earth Oh how it wishes

00:07

it could fit into the same para pans at war

00:09

eighteen million years ago That's Separate story All right check

00:13

out this passage Geo disease beginnings and lovable on science

00:17

noon and develops inside the chamber earth and sand Since

00:20

since you know comedians plato greek mathematician i swan I'm

00:28

in trouble Cancer sauce that sign All right here we

00:32

go How would you change the bolo Underline portion of

00:34

the passage if it all are more And here the

00:37

potential answers right No change is the more arm are

00:40

all right There are certain phrases that make our brain

00:43

and mouth hurt Just a sam are more falls into

00:46

that category We're not just gonna cross out option a

00:50

which suggests that no change is needed We're gonna launch

00:53

that sucker into the stratosphere Hostile avista baby As for

00:57

what this phrase should be well let's take a look

00:59

at the sense in which it appears and then skim

01:01

our answer choices so here's the sense lando's figure was

01:04

a guest in our committees are a more conservative approximation

01:08

based on scientific knowledge of time and hear the answer

01:11

choices He claims that is a more is the way

01:14

to go But the sentence states that plato's figure was

01:18

and guess so How can we suddenly change tenses and

01:21

say that our committee's figure is a guess Well it's

01:24

not like our communities is any more alive today than

01:26

plato To be honest neither of them are looking Too

01:28

good lately so it ain't be these got problems too

01:31

It can't be our more because plato in our communities

01:34

each have just one figure If the sentence said plato

01:37

in our communities guesses then we could certainly follow that

01:40

up with our But since figure is singular we can't

01:44

have a plural verb here though option d are incorrect

01:47

choice I don't see how ugly that sounds alright would

01:50

just leave see more here We don't use a verb

01:52

it all but that's not a problem The sentence doesn't

01:55

specifically mention that we're talking about our community's figure but

01:58

it's implied because the way the seine the structure it's

02:01

called gapping and it's used to avoid redundancy David letterman

02:05

is a big fan so in our new sentence even

02:08

though the words figure wass don't appear we can rest 00:02:12.293 --> [endTime] assured that they're still there at least in spirit

Related Videos

PSAT 1.1 Reading Diagnostic
1006 Views

PSAT 1.1 Reading Diagnostic. The main purpose of the first two paragraphs is to...what?

PSAT 2.2 Reading Diagnostic
379 Views

PSAT 2.2 Reading Diagnostic. What is the main rhetorical effect of this phrase in the second paragraph?

PSAT 1.3 Writing Diagnostic
282 Views

PSAT 1.3 Writing Diagnostic. To make the paragraph most logical, sentence 2 in the second paragraph should be placed...where?

PSAT 1.4 Writing Diagnostic
239 Views

PSAT 1.4 Writing Diagnostic. Which choice most effectively combines the two sentences in the underlined portion?

PSAT 1.5 Writing Diagnostic
239 Views

PSAT 1.5 Writing Diagnostic. How should the underlined portion be changed in the passage, if at all?